Referências Bibliográficas
Amossy, Ruth (2006), L’argumentation dans le discours, Paris, Armand Colin.

AMOSSY, Ruth (2008), «Argumentation et Analyse du discours: perspectives théoriques et découpages
disciplinaires» in
Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, n° 1 | 2008, [En ligne], mis en ligne le
06 septembre 2008. URL : http://aad.revues.org /index200.html, p. 4.

AMOSSY, Ruth (2009b), «Argumentation in Discourse: A Social Approach to Arguments» in Informal Logic,
vol. 29, nº 3, pp. 252-267.

ANGENOT, Marc (2008), Dialogues de sourds. Traité de rhétorique antilogique, Paris, Mille et une nuits.

ANSCOMBRE, Jean-Claude & DUCROT, Oswald (1997), L’argumentation dans la langue, 3.ª Ed., Bruxelles,
Pierre Mardaga Editeur.

ARISTÓTELES (1987), Tópicos, Lisboa, Guimarães Editores.

ARISTÓTELES (1998), Retórica, Lisboa, Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda.

BALKIN, J. M. (1996), «A Night in the Topics: The Reason of Legal Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Legal
Reason» in BROOKS, P. & GEWIRTH, P. (1996),
Law’s Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the
Law
, Yale Univ. Press, pp. 211-224. On line em
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/jbalkin/articles/topics1.htm

BALKIN, J. M. (2003), «The Proliferation of Legal Truth» in Havard Jounal of Law and Public Policy. On line
em http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/jbalkin/articles/proliferationoflegaltruth1.pdf

BARTHES, R., BOUTTES, J.-L. (1987), «Lugar comum» in Enciclopédia Einaudi, vol 11., I.N.C.M., Lisboa,
pp. 266-278

BATESON, G. (1972), Steps to an Ecology in Mind, Jason Aronson Inc.

BENOIT, P. J. (1992), «Characteristics of Arguing from a Social Actor’s Perspective» in BENOIT, W. L.,
HAMPLE, D. & BENOIT, P. J. (Eds) (1992),
Readings on argumentation, Berlin/New York,Foris
Publications.

BLAIR, J. A & JOHNSON, R. H. (1987a), «Argumentation as dialectical» in Argumentation 1, 41-56.

BLAIR, J. A. (1991), «Qu’est-ce que la logique non formelle?», in LAMPEREUR, A. (Ed.) (1991),
L’argumentation, Liége, Mardaga, pp. 79-89.

BLAIR, J. A. (1992), «Everyday argumentation from an informal logic perspective» in BENOIT, W. L.,
HAMPLE, D. & BENOIT, P. J. (Eds) (1992),
Readings on argumentation, Foris Publications,
Berlin/New York, pp. 357-376.

BLAIR, J. A. (2007), «The ‘logic’ of informal logic» in HENSEN, H. V., et al (Eds) (2007), Dissensus and
yhe Seach for Comum Ground
, CD-ROM (pp. 1-16), Windsor, ON, OSSSA.

BLAIR, J. A. (2009), «The pertinence of Toulmin and Perelman/Olbrechts-Tyteca for informal logic» in
RIBEIRO, H. J., (Ed) (2009),
Rhetoric and Arguementation in the Beginning of the XXst
Century
, Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, pp. 17-26.

BOURDIEU, Pierre (1982), O que falar quer dizer, Lisboa, Difel.

BOURDIEU, Pierre (2001), O poder simbólico, Lisboa, Difel.

BRETON, Philippe (1998), A argumentação na comunicação, Lisboa, Publicações D. Quixote.

BROCKRIEDE, W. (1972), «Arguers as Lovers» in Philosophy and Rhetoric, 5, pp. 1-11.

BROCKRIEDE, W. (1975), «Where is Argument?» in BENOIT, W. L., HAMPLE, D., BENOIT, P. J. (Eds)
(1992),
Readings on argumentation, Foris Publications, Berlin/New York.

CARRILHO, M. M.ª (2012), Pensar o Mundo, Coimbra, Grácio Editor.

CHARAUDEAU, Patrick (2008), «L’argumentation dans une problématique d’influence» in Argumentation et
Analyse du Discours
, n.1 | 2008 [En ligne], mis en ligne le 02 octobre 2008. URL:
http://aad.revues.org/index193.html.

CONLEY, T. (2003), «What Jokes Can Tell Us About Arguments» in JOST, W., OLMSTED, W. (Ed) (2003),
A Companion To Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism, Blackwell Publishing.

CROSSWHITE, J. (1996), The Rethoric of Reason. Writing and the Attractions of Argument, The University
of Wisconsin Press.

CZUBAROFF, J. (2007), «Justice and argument: toward developement of a dialogical argumentation
theory» in
Argumentation and Advocacy, Summer.

DUCROT, O. (1988), Polifonia e argumentación, Universidad del Valle, Calli, Colombia.

DUCROT, O. (1991), Dire et ne pas dire, Paris, Hermann.

DUCROT, O. (2004), «Argumentation rhétorique et argumentation linguistique» in DOURY, M. e MOIRAND,
S. (Org),
L’Argumentation aujourd’hui. Positions théoriques en confrontation, Paris, Presses
Sorbonne Nouvelle

EEMEREN, F.H. van; GROOTENDORST, R. (1991), «Les sophismes dans une perspective pragmatico-
dialectique» in LEMPEREUR, A. (Ed.) (1991),
L’argumentation, Liége, Mardaga.

EEMEREN, F. H. van e HOUTLOSSER, P. (2000), «Rhetoric in pragma-dialectics» in Argumentation,
Interpretation, Rhetoric
— On-line Journal, 1, 2000
http://argumentation.ru/2000_1/papers/1_2000p1.htm

EEMEREN, F. H. van e HOUTLOUSSER, P. (Eds) (2002a), Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof
Argumentation Analysis
, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

EEMEREN, Frans H. van, GROOTENDORST Rob, HENKEMANS, Francisca Snoek (2002c), Argumentation.
Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation
, London, LEA Publishers.

EEMEREN, F. van; GROOTENDORST, R. (2004a), A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-
dialectical approach,
 Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

EEMEREN, F. H. van & HOUTLOUSSER, P. (2004b), «Une vue synoptique de l’approche pragma-
dialectique» in DOURY, M. e MOIRAND, S. (Org.) (2004),
L’argumentation aujourd’hui.
Positions théoriques en confrontation
, Paris, Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle.

EEMEREN, Frans H. Van (2009), «Strategic Manouevering Betwen Rhetorical Effectiveness and Dialectical
Reasonableness» in RIBEIRO, Henrique Jales (Ed.) (2009),
Rhetoric and Arguemntation in the
Beginning of the XXst Century
, Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, pp. 55-72.

Foss, Sonja K., Foss, Karen A., e Trapp, Robert (2002a), Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric, 3.ª
Ed, Illinois, Waveland Press, Inc..

Foss, Sonja K., Foss, Karen A., e Trapp, Robert (2002b), Readings in Contemporany Rhetoric, Illinois,
Waveland Press, Inc..

FRANK, David A. (2004), «Argumentations studies in the wake of the New Rhetoric» in Argumentation an
Advocacy
, 40.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1977), Verdad y Metodo, Ediciones Sígueme, Salamanca.

GILBERT, Michael A. (1997), Coalescent Argumentation, New Jersey, Laurence Erlbaum Associate
Publishers.

GOFFMAN, Erving (1993), A Apresentação do Eu na Vida de Todos os Dias, Lisboa, Relógio d’Água.

GOODWIN, Jean (2001) «Henry Johnstone, Jr.’s Still-Unacknowledged Contribuition to Contemporary
Argumentation Theory» in
Informal Logic, vol. 21, nº 1, pp. 41-50.

GooDwin, Jean (2002), «Designing Issues» in F. H. van Eemeren e P. Houtlousser (Eds) (2002) Dialectic
and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof Argumentation Analysis
, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, pp. 81-96.

GOODWIN, Jean (2007a), «Argument Has No Function» in Informal Logic, vol. 27, n.º1, pp. 69-90.

Goodwin, Jean (2007b), «Theoretical Pieties, Johnstone’s Impiety, and Ordinary Views on
argumentation
» in Philosophy and Rhetoric, vol. 40, n.º1, pp. 36-50.

Grize, J.-B. (1986) «Raisonner en parlant» in, MEYER, M. (Ed.), 1986, De la méthaphysique à la
rhétorique
, Bruxelles, Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, pp. 45-55.

Grize, J.-B. (1992), «Logique naturelle et représentations sociales». Trata-se de uma comunicação
apresentada à
1st International Conference on Social Representations, Ravello, Italy (1992).
Disponível em http://www.psr.jku.at/ PSR1993/2_1993Grize.pdf).

Grize, J.-B. (1996), Logique naturelle & communications, Paris, P.U.F..

Grize, J.-B. (1997), Logique et langage, Paris, Ed. Ophrys.

Grize, J.-B. (2004),«Le point de vue de la logique naturelle: démonstrer, prouver, argumenter» in
doury, Marianne e moirand, Sophie (org.) (2004), L’argumentation aujoud’hui. Positions
théoriques en confrontation,
Paris, Presses Sorbornne Nouvelle, pp. 35-43.

GROARKE, Leo (2007), «Informal Logic», The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2007 edition),
edward n. zalta (ed.), url = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives /sum2007/entries/logic-
informal/>.

HABERMAS, Jürgen (1992), De l’éthique de la discussion, Paris, Cerf.

HAMBLIN, C.L. (1970), Fallacies, London, Methuen.

HAUSER, G. A. (2002), Introduction to Rhetorical Theory, Illinois, Waveland Press, Inc.

HENRY, P. (1992), A ferramenta imperfeita: língua, sujeito e discurso. Tradução de Maria Fausta Pereira
de Castro, Campinas, Ed. Unicamp.

JACKSON, Sally, & JACOBS, Scott (1980), «Structure of Conversational Argument: Pragmatic Bases for the
Enthymeme» in
The Quarterly Journal of Speech, LXVI.

Johnson, R.H. & Blair, J. A. (2005), J.A., Logical Self-Defense, NY, Idebate Press.

JOHNSTONE, H. W. Jr. (1959), Philosophy and Argument, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Sate University.

JURANVILLE, Alain (1984), Lacan et la Philosophie, Paris, P.U.F.

LAKOFF, G., JOHNSON, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

LEE, R., LEE, K. K. (1989), Arguing Persuasively, New York/London, Longman.

LUHMANN, N. (2006), La confiance: Un mécanisme de réduction de la complexité sociale, Paris,
Economica.

MAKAU, J. M., MARTY, D. L. (2001), Cooperative argumentation: A model for deliberative community, St.
Martin’s Press, New York.

MARTINS, Moisés de Lemos (2002), A linguagem, a verdade e o poder, Lisboa, Fundação Calouste
Gulbenkian/Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia.

MEYER, M. (1982), Logique, langage et argumentation, Paris, Hachette.

MEYER, M. (1993), Questions de rhétorique. Langage, Raison et Sédution, Paris, Librairie Générale
Française.

MEYER, M. (1994), «As bases da retórica» in CARRILHO, M. M.ª, (Org.), (1994), Retórica e Comunicação,
Porto, Edições ASA.

MEYER, M. (2005b), Qu’est-ce que l’argumentation?, Paris, Vrin.

NATANSON, M., JOHNSTONE, H. W. Jr., (ed) (1965), Philosophy, Rhetoric and Argumentation,
Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State University Press.

O’KEEFE, D. J. (1977), «Two concepts of agument» in Journal of the American Forensic Association, 13,
pp. 121-138.

O’KEEFE, D. J., (1982) «The Concepts of argument and Arguing» in COX, J. R., WILLARD, C.A. (Org.),
1982,
Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, Southern Ilinois University Press,
Carbondale and Edwardsville.

OLÉRON, P. (1987), L’argumentation, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.

PÊCHEUX, M. (1997) Semântica e discurso: uma crítica à afirmação do óbvio, tradução de Eni P. Orlandi et
al. 3.ed., Campinas, Ed. UNICAMP.

PERELMAN, Ch., OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, L. (1952), Rhétorique et Philosophie. Pour une théorie de
l’argumentation en philosophie
, Paris, P.U.F..

PERELMAN, Ch. (1968), Droit, Morale et Philosophie, Paris, L.G.D.J., Bibliothèque de Philosophie du Droit,
vol. VIII
.

PERELMAN, Ch. (1970), Le Champ de L’Argumentation, Bruxelles, Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles.

PERELMAN, Ch. (1972), Justice et Raison, 2e éd., Bruxelles, Éditions de l’Université Libré de Bruxelles.

PERELMAN, Ch. (1977), L’empire rhétorique - Rhétorique et Argumentation, Paris, J. Vrin. (Trad. Port.,
PERELMAN, Ch., 1993,
O império retórico. Retórica e argumentação, Porto, Edições ASA).

PERELMAN, Ch. (1986a), «Logique formelle et logique informelle», in Meyer, M. (Ed.), De la Métaphysique
à la Rhétorique
, Bruxelles, Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.

PERELMAN, Ch. (1987), «Argumentação» in Enciclopédia Einaudi, vol 11., I.N.C.M., Lisboa.

PERELMAN, Ch., OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, L. (1988), Traité de l’argumentation. La Nouvelle Rhétorique,
Bruxelles, Éd. de L’ Université de Bruxelles.

PLANTIN, Chr. (1989), Argumenter. De la langue de l’argumentation au discours argumenté,
CNDP, Paris.

PLANTIN, Chr. (1995d), «L’argument du paralogisme» in Hermès, 15-16, pp. 241-258.

PLANTIN, Chr. (1996), L’argumentation, Paris, Seuil.

PLANTIN, Chr. (1999), «La interacción argumentativa» in
Escritos 17/18, 23-49.

PLANTIN, Chr. (2002a) «Analyse et critique du discours argumentatif» in KOREN, Roselyne e AMOSSY,
Ruth (Org.) (2002),
Après Perelman: quelles politiques pour les nouvelles rhétoriques?, Paris,
L’Harmattan.

PLANTIN, Chr. (2003a), «Pensar el debate» in Signos 37 55, Valparaiso, Chile, Universidad Católica de
Valparaiso, pp.121-129.

PLANTIN, Chr. (2005), L’argumentation - Histoire, théories, perspectives, 
Paris, PUF.

PLANTIN, Chr. (2009b) «Deixem dizer: A norma do discurso de um está no discurso do outro» in Revista
Comunicação e Sociedade
, nº 16.

PLANTIN, Chr. (2011), Les bonnes raisons des émotions – Principes et méthode pour l’analyse de la parole
émotionnée
, Berne, Peter Lang.

POULAKOS, John (1999), «Toward a Sophistic Defenition of Rhetoric» in LUCAITES, John L., CONDIT,
Celeste M., Caudill (Org.), S. (1999),
Contemporary Rhetorical Theory, The Guilford Press, New
York/London.

REBOUL, O. (1991a), «Peut-il y avoir une argumentation non rhétorique? in LAMPEREUR, A. (Ed.) (1991),
L’argumentation, Liége, Mardaga, pp. 107-119.

Toulmin, Rieke & Janik (1984), An Introduction to Reasoning, 2.ª ed., NY, Macmillan Publishing
Company.

TOULMIN, S. (1958), The Uses of Argument, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Walton, D. (1989), Informal Logic, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

WALTON, D. (2007b), Media Argumentation. Dialectic, Persuasion and Rhetoric, Cambridge, Combridge
University Press.

WESTON, A. (1996), A arte de argumentar, Lisboa, Gradiva.

WHATELY, R. (1833), Elements of rhetoric, Brown, Shattuck and Company, Cambridge/Hilliard Gray & C.,
Boston.

Willard, C. A. (1989), A Theory of Argumentation, Tuscaloosa/London, The University of Alabama Press.

WILLARD, C. A. (2006), «Argumentation anda Postmodern Critique», in TRAPP, R., SCHUETS, J. (Eds)
(2006),
Perspectives on argumentation. Essays in Honnor of Wayne Brockriede, New York,
IDEBATEpress, pp. 221-231.

Zarefsky, D. (1995). Argumentation in the tradition of speech communication studies. In F. H. van
Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, and C. A.Willard (Eds.),
Perspectives and approaches:
Proceedings ofthe third ISSA conference on argumentation
, vol. 1 (pp. 32-49). Amsterdam:
SICSA.

Rui Alexandre Grácio
 
VocAbulário
 
© Rui GrÁcio 2015